Radio show and Lessons in Interviewing
I mostly listen to the FM radio on my drive to and from the office. I don’t really have a long drive – so I don’t get a lot of time to do that and more so because I also use that time a lot to speak to friends and relatives on the phone. But something that interested me, a couple of days back, was a show that was aired on the radio while I was driving to the office – where this host was giving away free movie tickets to the callers giving “wrong answers” to the questions being asked. Interesting because I was also trying to answer the questions being asked and it didn’t seem that easy to me as it appeared when I first found out the rules. The questions were so trivial that you will automatically come up with the right answer. So, giving a wrong answer would actually take more time than the right ones and that would only limit the number of free tickets that you could have won.
As soon as I started to walk towards the elevator – I was thinking if the same logic can be applied in other things – including interviewing candidates for a job. You see that I am always thinking about different ways to spot the right talent for Tekriti. Let me take an example here.
One of the things that I have started doing recently more and more while interviewing candidates is to first describe to them a scenario / problem that they would have no idea about and then ask follow-up questions. As an interviewer, the thing that I do is to try to get the right answers from the interviewee – and would give them a few choices to begin with, when they are stuck, that would lead them to the final answer. So, something that I focus a lot in the process is to describe why a choice is the ‘right answer’. But something that I haven’t tried is to let the guys try out ‘reaching to the solution using elimination techniques’. So, instead of telling them the right answer and then explain the reason for it – it might be a better idea to lead them to the solution by helping them find the wrong answers first. This logic is something that is highly useful in solving multiple choice questions in a lot of examinations – and I, personally, have used it a lot.
But now, it may be worth a try to use the same approach during the next few interviews – I just need to organize my thoughts a bit more to be able to do a good job at this and be fair to the next person.








What you just said is the proof that a very insignificant and trivial happenings teach us a lot in life.
And about that eliminatiion techinique, it is a cool idea to follow in interviews. That way it can be assessed whether a candidate can actually spot the wrong approach to to the problem or not.
It’s really a wonderful idea. By asking interviewee, whether the given approach is best or not, it can be easily found that how far the candidate can think.
Yeah – let me try it out and see how it goes. Wanted to try this out this weekend only – but it didn’t work-out that way.
You can use the wrong answer approach to try and find out how much the candidate really knows about something or how he thinks..
Eg. one of the usual .NET interveiw question is what are the improvements in ASP.NET compared to ASP. So if I ask, what the the things that are bad about ASP.NET compared to ASP, then the candidate has to really think as it is not something that people expect or are prepared for. This would help you analyse them from a different angle.